Legal Opinion

Barco v. Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Philadelphia

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 26, 1942No. 9990PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

This suit was filed in equity to compel the reinstatement of a life insurance policy and the payment of benefits accrued thereunder on the ground that the policy had been improperly and illegally cancelled due to a mutual mistake as to an existing fact. The court below held that the circumstances relied upon did not constitute a mutual mistake of fact, and judgment was entered for the insurer. The plaintiffs appealed.

These are the undisputed facts: Samuel J. Barco purchased a policy of life insurance from the Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company. On April 25, 1938, when…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The Franklin Life Ins. Co. v. TharpeSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  2. Hallowes v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  3. Reliance Life Ins. Co, of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. LynchSupreme Court of Florida · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nalley v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
  2. Nalley v. New York Life Ins.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API