Barco v. Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Philadelphia
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
This suit was filed in equity to compel the reinstatement of a life insurance policy and the payment of benefits accrued thereunder on the ground that the policy had been improperly and illegally cancelled due to a mutual mistake as to an existing fact. The court below held that the circumstances relied upon did not constitute a mutual mistake of fact, and judgment was entered for the insurer. The plaintiffs appealed.
These are the undisputed facts: Samuel J. Barco purchased a policy of life insurance from the Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company. On April 25, 1938, when…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- The Franklin Life Ins. Co. v. TharpeSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
- Hallowes v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
- Reliance Life Ins. Co, of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. LynchSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nalley v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
- Nalley v. New York Life Ins.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1943