Legal Opinion

Torch Energy Marketing, Inc. v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided August 13, 2003No. CIV.A.H-01-3402Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ROSENTHAL, District Judge.

This declaratory judgment action arose from a California Production Balancing-Agreement (“CPBA”) between plaintiff, Torch Energy Marketing, Inc. (“TEMI”), and defendant, Pacific Gas and Electric (“PG & E”). Under the CPBA, TEMI distributed natural gas through a pipeline PG & E owned. The contract required delivery of a specified amount of gas. Failure to deliver less than the specified amount in a given month created an imbalance. If TEMI did not act to correct the imbalance within a set period, and the accrued imbalance exceeded a set amount, PG…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gay Law Students Ass'n v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  2. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Morin v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  4. United Parcel Service, Inc., Etc. v. Weben Industries, Inc., and Conveyor, MacHinery & Steel Erectors, Inc. v. Mercantile National Bank at DallasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  5. Empire West v. Southern California Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API