Jones v. Fire & Casualty Insurance
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR ORDER QUASHING INTERROGATORIES
BLUMENFELD, District Judge.
The plaintiff has addressed interrogatories under Rule 31, Fed.R.Civ.P., to the United States District Judge before whom his criminal case in North Carolina was tried to a jury. • This motion to quash the interrogatories was entered on behalf of the judge by the United States Attorney for the Western District of North Carolina.1 Although the questions for the most part are argumentative, repetitive and harassing (most of them seek matters easily found as a matter of public record, viz, numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Yaselli v. GoffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Standard Oil Co. v. City of LincolnSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Howard v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Garfield v. PalmieriDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- National Retired Teachers Ass'n v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1977
- United States v. AbellDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1982