Legal Opinion

Excess Line Ass'n v. Waldorf & Associates

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 2013PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Elizabeth Hazlitt Emerson, J.

It is, ordered that the motion (001) by defendants Waldorf & Associates, Waldorf Risk Solutions, LLC, Waldorf Special Risk, LLC, Waldorf Servicing, LLC, William G. Waldorf, Stephen M. Waldorf, Christopher Y. Waldorf, Sr., and the Waldorf Family *761Foundation, Inc. for an order pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1), (3), (5), and (7) dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against them is granted; and it is further ordered that the motion (002) by defendant Pamela J. Waldorf for an order pursuant to CPLR 3211 dismissing the complaint insofar as…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Mandarin Trading Ltd. v. WildensteinNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Society of Plastics Industry, Inc. v. County of SuffolkNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Burns Jackson Miller Summit & Spitzer v. LindnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Excess Line Association of New York (ELANY) v. Waldorf & AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API