Legal Opinion

Rimar v. McCowan

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 29, 1974No. Civ. A. 39349PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GUBOW, District Judge.

The court has before it a motion to quash service of process as to all Defendants other than Chrysler Corporation. In addition to the briefs and arguments of counsel, the court has carefully reviewed the deposition of Agent Edward J. Roach of the F.B.I.

Plaintiff’s action grows out of an allegedly illegal search and seizure of property claimed to belong to Plaintiff and alleged to have been turned over to, and retained by, Defendant Chrysler. The complaint is in three counts. Only count 1 purports to invoke Federal jurisdiction, and the remaining counts…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. First National City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Schlanger v. SeamansSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Lamb v. SchmittSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Harry S. Barnes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  5. Liberation News Service v. EastlandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mad Hatter, Inc. v. Mad Hatters Night Club Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1975
  2. Overby v. JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1976
  3. Green v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API