Legal Opinion

Monaco v. Hartz Mountain Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 9, 2004PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Long

The primary issue in this appeal centers on the liability of a commercial landowner in a case in which a traffic sign, situated on its sidewalk, became dislodged and caused injury to the landowner’s invitee. The trial court and the Appellate Division held that the commercial landowner had no “legal” duty with respect to the sign that was owned and installed by the City of Newark over which the landowner had no control. We hold that those decisions, based solely on ownership and control, too narrowly conceived the obligations of a commercial landowner. Applying well-settled principles, we are…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Dolson v. AnastasiaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  4. Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo RealtorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  5. Goldberg v. Housing Auth. of City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Charlotte Robinson v. Frank Vivirito (072407)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  2. Godfrey v. Princeton Theological SeminarySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  3. Holmes v. Kimco Realty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  4. Janice J. Prioleau v. Kentucky Fried Chicken, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
  5. Potente v. County of HudsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API