Legal Opinion

Lohstreter v. Lohstreter

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 2001No. 20000094PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Bruce Lohstreter appealed a second amended judgment ordering him to pay $16,700 in spousal support and $12,000 in attorney fees. Kathleen Heintz cross-appealed claiming the trial court erred in reducing Bruce’s child support payment, the trial court erred by not considering gifts from Bruce’s parents as income for purposes of calculating child support, and the trial court abused its discretion in failing to require Bruce to pay all of the minor child’s uninsured medical expenses. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Bruce and Kathleen married on March 14, 1975, and divorced on…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mahoney v. MahoneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Weigel v. WeigelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Van Klootwyk v. Van KlootwykNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Schiff v. SchiffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Greenwood v. GreenwoodNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Rothberg v. RothbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. McDowell v. McDowellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  4. Toni v. ToniNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Dickson v. DicksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API