Wilkinson v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The appeal in this Workmen’s Compensation case is concerned only with questions of fact, and our province is to determine whether there is substantial evidence in the record sufficient to sustain the findings of fact of the referee, which were affirmed by the board.
While the form of the findings could have been improved, and they should have been segregated from the discussion, and; separately and concisely stated, there can be no doubt that the referee found—and the board approved the finding—that the claimant’s husband sustained an electrical shock, which aggravated a previously…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Trent v. Union Pacific Coal CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1951
- Icenhour v. Freedom Oil Works Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Svestka v. Union Collieries Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Rehm v. Union Collieries Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Bepler v. Boyd & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.