Strolberg v. Brandenberg
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Plaintiff, claiming under the mortgage from one Isaac Strolberg mentioned in the opinion, brought this action in the district court for Otter Tail county to recover the value of 275 bushels of'wheat talien by defendant, as sheriff of the county, on execution on a judgment against the mortgagor. At the trial before Baxter, J., the plaintiff had a verdict, and he appeals from an order granting a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
That part of the mortgage involved in this controversy which is written (a printed blank having been used) is not a work of great professional merit. The' description of the property is as follows: “All that certain personal property described as follows, to wit: The N W | of N W | and S W J of N W J, in section 11, township number one hundred thirty-four (134) north, of range thirty-eight (38), eightie, (39) ackers in crop,.(33) ackers in whead and (6) ackers ods, all of said property, ” etc. It was duly filed in the town clerk’s office, and, if the description be’ sufficient, was of such…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Griffiths v. Wheeler & BarberSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
3Cited by4 opinions
- Helgeson v. Farmers Co-Operative Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Big Stone County Bank v. Crown Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Miller v. McCray Refrigerator Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- First National Bank of Herman v. Cargill Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923