Legal Opinion

Rediger v. Country Mutual Insurance Co.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided April 14, 2017No. Case No. 6:16-cv-02263-AAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

Ann Aiken, United States District Judge

This dispute concerns defendant County Mutual Insurance Company’s (“defendant”) alleged failure to issue a policy on terms agreed to between plaintiffs Jared and Myranda Rediger (“plaintiffs”) .and insurance agent Bob Bronson (“agent”). Defendant moves to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(7) for failure to join a party under Fed. R. Civ. P. 19. For the reasons below, defendant’s motion is denied.

BACKGROUND

Agent was a licensed insurance agent in Oregon and an authorized agent of defendant. Pis.’ Compl. ¶ 5 (doc. 1). In June 2014, agent…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Republic of Philippines v. PimentelSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Makah Indian Tribe v. C. William VerityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Northrop Corp. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Universal Coating Systems, LLC v. Theron Dave Waldo; Mark Waldo; Doug Waldo; John Mayhew; Carolina Composites; Paul Goertz; R&R Manufacturing, Inc.; and Midwest Film Coating, LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API