Weire v. State

The Defendant appeals his jury conviction and sentence for strong-armed robbery. He argues that a prosecutor’s remark and the admission of collateral crimes evidence warrant a new trial. We find no merit in these issues.

He also contends that the trial court erred in sentencing him as a habitual felony offender, a habitual violent felony offender, and a prison releasee reoffender. The State contends this argument is not preserved because the Defendant failed to object to his sentence during the sentencing hearing or file a Rule 3.800(b) motion. While the Defendant’s argument is unpre-served,…