Legal Opinion

Parce v. Flotsam, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 8, 1966No. 65-478PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The plaintiff was a business invitee on the premises of the defendant, the operator of a clothing store. She fell in arising from a three-legged stool which she alleged was placed so that one or more of the legs were on a rug and one or more on a slick terrazzo floor. In her complaint, the appellant alleged injury by reason of the maintenance of an unsafe condition on the premises. The trial judge concluded that the facts were essentially undisputed and entered a summary final judgment as a matter of law for the defendant, appellee.

There is no controversy as to the evidentiary facts involved.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Farrey v. BettendorfSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. Matson v. Tip Top Grocery Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1942
  3. Miller v. ShullSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  4. Saunders v. KaplanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  5. Schneider v. K. S. B. Realty & Investing Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Grand Union Co. v. DevlinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API