Phœnix Insurance v. Pratt
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Anoka county, Koon, J., presiding, denying its motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.
The defendants were, local agents for the plain- ■ tiff in the city of Anoka, conducting insurance business in its behalf, from June, 1881, until some time after March 4, 1885. They had also been engaged in a general insurance business for many years before. In April, 1888, the defendants, as such agents, issued a •policy, in behalf of plaintiff, to the First. National Bank of Anoka, ■■upon the Anoka City mill for one year, which was thereafter renewed :from year to year, and was in force in March, 1885, when the mill 'was burned. In July, 1884, the plaintiff appointed one Otto Greely…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ganser v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
3Cited by4 opinions
- Holman v. All Nation Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Continental Insurance v. Clark & CresslerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Phoenix Insurance v. SeegersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. v. HardingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912