Legal Opinion

Phœnix Insurance v. Pratt

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 11, 1887PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Anoka county, Koon, J., presiding, denying its motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.

The defendants were, local agents for the plain- ■ tiff in the city of Anoka, conducting insurance business in its behalf, from June, 1881, until some time after March 4, 1885. They had also been engaged in a general insurance business for many years before. In April, 1888, the defendants, as such agents, issued a •policy, in behalf of plaintiff, to the First. National Bank of Anoka, ■■upon the Anoka City mill for one year, which was thereafter renewed :from year to year, and was in force in March, 1885, when the mill 'was burned. In July, 1884, the plaintiff appointed one Otto Greely…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ganser v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Holman v. All Nation Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Continental Insurance v. Clark & CresslerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. Phoenix Insurance v. SeegersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. v. HardingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API