Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Collins

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1996No. 95-1275PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Whether the evidence conforms to the indictment is not a jurisdictional issue as contended by petitioner-appellant. However, habeas corpus relief may be granted for nonjurisdictional claims, if the petitioner has no adequate remedy at law. State ex rel. Firman v. Money (1993), 69 Ohio St.3d *414591, 593, 635 N.E.2d 26, 29. Issues involving the relationship of the indictment to the evidence may clearly be appealed. See State v. O’Brien (1987), 30 Ohio St.3d 122, 30 OBR 436, 508 N.E.2d 144. Thus, petitioner in this case had an adequate remedy at law.

Accordingly, we overrule the motion to strike…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pirman v. MoneyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. O'BrienOhio Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Massie v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Hart v. HudsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. State ex rel. Massie v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Pruitt v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Rock v. BracyOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API