Legal Opinion

Tricham Housing Associates, L.P. v. Klein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 9, 2014Published

1Opinion of the Court

In an attempt to settle the claims and counterclaims between them, plaintiff and defendant Emanuel Panitz entered into a memorandum of understanding (MOU) pursuant to which Panitz’s legal fees would be paid, provided that the claims of defendants Allan Klein, Lobby Design Group, and Steeltech SA (the LDG defendants, collectively) failed. In exchange for this, Panitz assigned plaintiff his remaining cross claims against the LDG defendants. This agreement is void and unenforceable as against public policy. Although his claims against plaintiff have been settled, Panitz is still a witness in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. Cablevision Systems Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Bergoff Detective Service, Inc. v. WaltersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API