Frito-Lay, Inc., Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMAN, Circuit Judge:
This case presents the frequently encountered question of whether the National Labor Relations Board properly concluded that a company [Frito-Lay, Inc.] had violated § 8(a) (5) and (1) of the Act by refusing to bargain with the certified representative of a unit of its employees. The Company petitions for review and the Board has filed a cross application for enforcement. We find that the Order is due to be enforced.
The secret ballot election was held at the Company’s Orlando, Florida, plant *170on July 18, 1968, in a unit made up of twenty driver-salesmen. The Union won…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Golden Age Beverage CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- National Labor Relations Board v. Smith Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Bush Hog, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- National Labor Relations Board v. National Beverages, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
3Cited by4 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Overland Hauling, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- National Labor Relations Board v. Claxton Poultry Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- National Labor Relations Board v. Martin Building Material Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Frito-Lay, Inc., Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970