Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Marriage of Calcagno

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 12, 1982No. 80-811-E, CA 21412Published

1DissentVan Hoomissen, J.

The record in this case satisfies me that wife may have an obligation to pay some child support to husband. See Sellers and Sellers, 39 Or App 647, 593 P2d 1191 (1979); Westby and Westby, 30 Or App 431, 567 P2d 145 (1977); Waymire and Waymire, 17 Or App 562, 522 P2d 1394 (1974); D’Ambrosio v. D'Ambrosio, 15 Or App 435, 515 P2d 1353 (1973).

The majority correctly notes that “neither party presented evidence directly on [the support] issue.” Nor does the record contain evidence of the support needs of the children. Smith v. Smith, 290 Or 675, 626 P2d 342 (1981). Absent such evidence, we cannot…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Matter of Marriage of SellersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. D'Ambrosio v. D'AmbrosioCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  4. In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of WestbyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  5. In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of WaymireCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API