Legal Opinion

Wonderbowl, Inc. v. Bumb

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 10, 1972No. 25723PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

456 F.2d 954

In the Matter of WONDERBOWL, INC., a California corporation, Debtor.

CARUSO ENTERPRISES, INC., a corporation, Respondent-Appellant,

v.

A. J. BUMB, Trustee of Wonderbowl, Inc., Appellee.

No. 25723.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

March 10, 1972.

George M. Treister (argued), of Quittner, Stutman, Treister & Glatt, Sulmeyer, Kupetz & Alberts, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent-appellant.

C. E. H. McDonnell (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before BROWNING and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and COPPLE,* District Judge.

2Per curiam

1

Wonderbowl, Inc., filed a petition in the court below for…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Foust v. Munson Steamship LinesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Texas v. DonoghueSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Ford v. MageeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  5. In the Matter of Wonderbowl, Inc., a California Corporation, Debtor. Caruso Enterprises, Inc. v. A. J. Bumb, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Scroggins v. Powell (In Re Kaleidoscope, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1980
  2. Peter Pan Seafoods, Inc. v. M/V POLAR VIKINGDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API