Legal Opinion

State v. Rocha

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 18, 1999No. 13-95-398-CRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YÁÑEZ, Justice.

The State appeals the dismissal of its indictment against appellee, Ramiro V. Rocha, for possession of controlled substances. The trial court dismissed the indictment on the ground that it issued after a controlled substances tax was assessed against appellee by the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts and was, therefore, barred by the double jeopardy prohibition. By three points of error, the State contends that mere notice of assessment of a controlled substances tax does not constitute punishment within the meaning of the constitutional prohibitions against double…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Ex Parte WardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  3. Stennett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. State v. Rocha, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
  5. Ledford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API