Legal Opinion

Village of Highland Park v. Detroit & Birmingham Plank-Road Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1893Published

Appeal from Wayne. (Reilly, J.) Bill to restrain a plank-road company from establishing, keeping, or maintaining a toll-gate within the limits of complainant village. Defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Hooker, O. J.

The defendant, a plank-road company, has for many years maintained a' toll-gate at a point south of the village of Highland Park, a suburb of Detroit. In consideration of the sum of $5,000, it agreed to remove said toll-gate, and thereafter to maintain no toll-gate within five miles of the city hall in Detroit, and to col*490lect no tolls of jDersons traveling over the portion of the road south of the gate to be established beyond said five mile limit, except such as should pass through said gate. Complainant, through its officers, thereupon filed the bill in this cause to restrain…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Detroit v. Detroit & Howell Plank Road Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. City of Detroit v. Detroit & Erin Plank Road Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1864

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API