Legal Opinion

Carr v. W. T. Grant Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 10, 1933No. 29,335PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLT, Justice.

Defendant appeals from a judgment awarding plaintiff damages for injury to his hand received when caught between the inside and outside swinging vestibule doors of defendant’s store in Minneapolis, Minnesota. . After verdict defendant moved “in the .alterna tive for judgment notwithstanding or a new trial. A new trial was granted unless plaintiff consented to reduce the verdict to $1,000. Plaintiff consented.

The assignments of error do not properly raise any point upon which to reverse. Four errors are assigned, hut not in such manner as to show the materiality of the ruling…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Enterprise Co. v. PfeiferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. TraverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  2. Leybold v. Fox Butte Theater Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Chicago Great Western Railway Co. v. CasuraCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
  4. Chicago Great Western Railway Company v. Walter R. Casura and Swift & Company, Swift & Company v. Walter R. Casura and Chicago Great Western Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
  5. Hennepin County Welfare Department v. FishSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API