Legal Opinion
Snell v. CITY OF YORK, PENNSYLVANIA
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 27, 2009No. 07-4439, 07-4437, 07-4438PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
RENDELL, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Edward Snell appeals from the District Court’s grant of summary judgment and dismissal of his Monell claims for municipal liability in this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Snell is a pro-life advocate who regularly speaks to pregnant women as they enter the medical clinic (hereinafter “Clinic” or “Facility”) of Planned Parenthood of Central Pennsylvania (“Planned Parenthood”) in York, Pennsylvania. Appellee Sergeant Ronald Camacho, a member of the City of York police department, is one of several officers assigned to overtime detail at…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- McTernan v. City of York, Pa.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- McTernan v. City of York, Penn.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Alejandro Velazquez v. City of Long BeachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. MarcavageCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Carlson v. BukovicCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.