Legal Opinion
First Nat. Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided August 16, 1922PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SYMES, District Judge.
Several interesting questions were discussed by counsel at the hearing on the demurrer to the complaint* *701but no useful purpose would be served at this time by an expression of opinion thereon.
The Hallack & Howard Lumber Company deposited with the plaintiff several checks payable to it, drawn on the State Bank of Ordway, Colo. The plaintiff, in the usual course of business, deposited them with the defendant bank for collection, and the latter in turn, forwarded them direct to the drawee bank for collection. The latter, after debiting the account of its customer, the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Exchange Nat. Bank of Pittsburgh v. Third Nat. Bank of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Hoover v. WiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Taylor & Bournique Co. v. National Bank of AshtabulaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1919
- First National Bank v. Manhattan Life InsuranceColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Douglas v. Federal Reserve BankDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1924
- Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City v. First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930