Legal Opinion

Matter of Kornreich

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 23, 1997Published

1Opinion of the Court

149 N.J. 346 (1997)

693 A.2d 877

IN THE MATTER OF CHEN KORNREICH, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued December 2, 1996.

Decided May 23, 1997.

Walton W. Kingsbery, III, Deputy Ethics Counsel, argued the cause on behalf of the Office of Attorney Ethics.

Brian J. Neary argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Neary, attorney; Mr. Neary and Yung-Mi Lee, on the brief).

2Per curiam

This is an attorney-disciplinary case. Respondent Chen Kornreich was charged with motor-vehicular offenses arising from a car accident with another motorist. Thereafter, respondent misled the municipal court, as well as…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

3Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re PennicaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  2. In Re HughesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. Application of MatthewsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  4. In Re VerdiramoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  5. Matter of ConwaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API