Manuel F. Palancar v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtCiklin, C.J.
Manuel Palancar appeals the orders revoking probation and imposing a prison sentence. We agree that the trial court erred in finding that the state proved the new offense of disorderly intoxication, and we reverse and remand for the court to reinstate probation.
Pursuant to a negotiated plea, Palancar was placed on probation for a drug offense. Among other terms, the probation order provided, by numerically designated paragraphs, the following:(5) You will live without violating any law....
[[Image here]](7) You will not use intoxicants to excess ....
[[Image here]](9) You will ... comply with…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Robinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Blake v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- C.P. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Royster v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Jernigan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Corbin v. Prummell, Jr.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2024
- Ron DeSantis, Governor v. Dream DefendersSupreme Court of Florida · 2024