Legal Opinion
Hertz v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided January 10, 2014No. 3:12-CV-00141-LRH-RAMPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company’s (“Hartford”) Motion for Summary Judgment. Doc. # 50.1 Plaintiff Barbara Hertz (“Hertz”) filed a Response (Doc. # 57), to which Hartford replied (Doc. #58). Also before the Court is Hertz’s Motion for Judgment Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52. Doc. # 52. Hartford filed a Response (Doc. # 55), to which Hertz replied (Doc. # 60).
I. Introduction
This is an action for long term disability (“LTD”) benefits pursuant to the Employee Retirement and Income Security Act of 1974…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Linda Gail Calvert v. Firstar Finance, Inc., F/k/a Star Bank Corporation, and Liberty Life Assurance Company of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Wanda Glenn v. Metlife (Metropolitan Life Insurance Company) and Long Term Disability Plan for Associates of Sears, Roebuck and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Adams v. Symetra Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- Franklin v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023
- Wallace v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025