Legal Opinion · Dissent

Baird v. Sax Auto Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1940No. File No. 6617Published

1DissentMorris, J.

I am unable to agree with the opinion of the majority. It is based upon the premise that the foreclosure sale is only voidable. In my opinion the sale is a complete nullity and none of the parties acquired any rights thereunder.

The mortgage that was foreclosed described Lots 10 and 11. The value of the premises consists chiefly of a building that is located on both lots. Lot 12 adjacent to Lot 11 is vacant. The judgment and decree in the foreclosure action and the special execution issued pursuant thereto properly described Lots 10 and 11 and directed the sheriff to offer them separately and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jenkins Land & Live Stock Co. v. AttwoodNebraska Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API