Legal Opinion

Banko v. Rotor X Aircraft Manufacturing Company

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided September 6, 2024No. 2:23-cv-02265Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Matthew Banko, No. CV-23-02265-PHX-JAT 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Rotor X Aircraft Manufacturing Company, Donald Orval Shaw, Unknown Shaw, 13 Benjamin Donald Shaw, and Unknown Shaw, 14 15 Defendants. 16 Pending before the Court is a motion filed by all defense counsel to withdraw from 17 representation for all Defendants. (Doc. 21). The motion seeks to leave all Defendants pro 18 se. 19 Local Rule 83.3 states that that an attorney seeking to withdraw must file an 20 application, “…setting forth the reasons…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. D-Beam Ltd. Partnership v. Roller Derby Skates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API