Legal Opinion

Ex parte Maule

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1886PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Habeas corpus.

1Opinion of the CourtReese, J.

This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus. From the petition it appears that a complaint was made before the county judge of Fillmore county, charging James E. Mack and others with a violation of chapter 50, Compiled Statutes of 1885, in the sale of intoxicating liquors without a license. A warrant was issued for his arrest, and upon being brought before the county judge he plead guilty to *274the charge, and under the provisions of section 313 of the criminal code he was fined the sum of $100.00, and in default of payment was committed to the jail of the county, there to be confined…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Martin v. SanfordNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  2. McGarvey v. PrinceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Stetter v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API