In re Estate of Noble
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 101, Oct. T., 1896, by James H. Irwin from decree of O. C. Allegheny Co., Feb. T., 1896, No. 48, surcharging him as guardian. Exceptions to guardian’s account. From the record it appeared that J. H. Irwin was appointed guardian of the minor children of John Noble, deceased, on March 22, 1884. One of these minors, Mary E. Noble, arrived at her majority October 2, 1895, and on January 3, 1896, appellant filed his account as her guardian.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 101, Oct. T., 1896, by James H. Irwin from decree of O. C. Allegheny Co., Feb. T., 1896, No. 48, surcharging him as guardian. Exceptions to guardian’s account. From the record it appeared that J. H. Irwin was appointed guardian of the minor children of John Noble, deceased, on March 22, 1884. One of these minors, Mary E. Noble, arrived at her majority October 2, 1895, and on January 3, 1896, appellant filed his account as her guardian. The estate of the ward consisted of $5,000 paid appellant July 7,1884, and $2,290 paid him February 4, 1886. The guardian testified that he had…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
There is nothing in this record that would justify us in sustaining either of the assignments of error. The questions involved have been fully considered and correctly disposed of by the learned president of the court below; and on his opinion the decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.
2Cited by5 opinions
- Luke v. KettenbachIdaho Supreme Court · 1919
- Kipp's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Carr's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Clark's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Estate of Halpern v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1995