Legal Opinion

Ineson v. Reznik

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1985PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Morrie Slifkin, J.

Defendant Suzanne Reznik was a tenant of an apartment in Mamaroneck in premises which were subject to regulation under the Emergency Tenant Protection Act of 1974 (McKinney’s Uncons Laws of NY § 8621 et seq.; L 1974, ch 576, § 4, as amended). Pursuant to her lease, defendant was obligated to pay to the landlord $397.14 per month. On November 1, 1982, defendant sublet the apartment to plaintiffs for the sum of $525 per month. They paid this sum to defendant for 20 months after which they ceased making any payments to defendant but proceeded to pay directly…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jacobus v. . ColgateNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Standard Chemicals & Metals' Corp. v. Waugh Chemical Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Vance v. Century Apartments AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. City of Corning v. Corning Police DepartmentNew York Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Huttlinger v. Royal Dutch West India MailAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Frontier Insurance v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API