Legal Opinion

Ball v. Arends

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 20, 1997No. 96-772PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam 1

REVERSED. See MX Investments, Inc. v. Crawford, 683 So.2d 584 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Makar v. Investors Real Estate Management, Inc., 553 So.2d 298 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

BOOTH, JOANOS and WOLF, JJ., concur.

ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION

2Per curiam 2

We reversed the award of attorney’s fees in this cause, pursuant to our decisions in MX Investments, Inc. v. Crawford, 683 So.2d 584 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996), and Makar v. Investors Real Estate Management, Inc., 553 So.2d 298 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). In her motion for certification, appellee requests that we certify that our decision conflicts with decisions of the Second and…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Makar v. Investors Real Estate Management, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  2. Tampa Letter Carriers, Inc. v. MacKDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. Special's Trading v. Intern. ConsumerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  4. MX Investments, Inc. v. CrawfordDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Arends v. BallSupreme Court of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API