Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Froelich
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided February 6, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
The trust estate which is the subject-matter of the present accounting was erected pursuant to a testamentary direction to invest $1,000 for the benefit of Elsie Dunkel, to apply the income for her benefit until she attained the age of twenty-five years, and then to pay her the principal.
This sum came into the hands of the trustee following a decree of this court dated February 13, 1931. After consulting with the cestui que trust named in the will, and pursuant to her approval, the trustee invested the principal fund in a five and one-half per cent participation certificate in a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- King v. . TalbotNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts McAlpineNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Villard v. . VillardNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- In re the Estate of McCaffertyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Estate of StupackNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
- In re the Estate of LeedsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
- In re the Estate of TurnerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
- In re the Estate of ChildsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939