Legal Opinion

People v. Williamson

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 28, 1976PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. Although the court in its charge need "not marshal or refer to the evidence to any greater extent than is necessary” to explain the material legal principles (CPL 300.10, subd 2), any marshaling of the evidence must be done fairly. Here the court chose to summarize all the direct testimony of all the witnesses and in addition pointed out the single inconsistency in the defendant’s testimony. However, the court neglected to mention any of the numerous inconsistencies in the testimony of the witnesses for the prosecution. In our view this was error and since the whole case turned on…

2Cited by32 opinions

  1. People v. De JesusNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. People v. SaundersNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. BrensicAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. People v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. People v. HollisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API