People v. Williamson
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. Although the court in its charge need "not marshal or refer to the evidence to any greater extent than is necessary” to explain the material legal principles (CPL 300.10, subd 2), any marshaling of the evidence must be done fairly. Here the court chose to summarize all the direct testimony of all the witnesses and in addition pointed out the single inconsistency in the defendant’s testimony. However, the court neglected to mention any of the numerous inconsistencies in the testimony of the witnesses for the prosecution. In our view this was error and since the whole case turned on…
2Cited by32 opinions
- People v. De JesusNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. SaundersNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. BrensicAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. HollisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.