Sweeney v. King's Daughters Medical Center
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) dismissed the claimant’s application for benefits, finding that she failed to show a permanent, work-related injury. The Workers’ Compensation Board and the Court of Appeals affirmed. Appealing, the claimant argues that Kentucky should adopt a rule that gives the opinions of a treating physician greater weight than those of an examining physician. She also argues that the ALJ misconstrued the law regarding pre-existing injuries and failed to support the decision with substantial evidence.
We affirm. Neither Chapter 342 nor the applicable…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Special Fund v. FrancisKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
- Wolf Creek Collieries v. CrumCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1984
- Snawder v. SticeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1979
- John F. WALKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- McNutt Construction/First General Services v. ScottKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kindred Healthcare v. Carlye HarperKentucky Supreme Court · 2022