Legal Opinion

Sweeney v. King's Daughters Medical Center

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 2008No. 2007-SC-000885-WCPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) dismissed the claimant’s application for benefits, finding that she failed to show a permanent, work-related injury. The Workers’ Compensation Board and the Court of Appeals affirmed. Appealing, the claimant argues that Kentucky should adopt a rule that gives the opinions of a treating physician greater weight than those of an examining physician. She also argues that the ALJ misconstrued the law regarding pre-existing injuries and failed to support the decision with substantial evidence.

We affirm. Neither Chapter 342 nor the applicable…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Special Fund v. FrancisKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Wolf Creek Collieries v. CrumCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1984
  3. Snawder v. SticeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1979
  4. John F. WALKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  5. McNutt Construction/First General Services v. ScottKentucky Supreme Court · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kindred Healthcare v. Carlye HarperKentucky Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API