Legal Opinion
Karl L. Cannon v. U.S. Department of Justice, United States Parole Commission
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided September 17, 1992No. 91-4340PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Petition for Rehearing
(Opinion May 19, 1992, 5th Cir.1992, 961 F.2d 82)
Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, KING and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. POLITZ, Chief Judge:
The United States Parole Commission seeks a rehearing, urging that our panel decision erred in two separate respects: (1) in holding that the Commission rather than the Bureau of Prisons must take into account foreign good-time credits in computing a release date, and (2) in holding that U.S.S.G. § 5Gl.l(b) applies when the foreign-court-imposed sentence exceeds the guideline range.
Discussion
Although we deny the relief requested in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lem Moon Sing v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Chew Heong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Cook v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Fellows v. BlacksmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Bishop v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Adebola Olumbunm Ajala v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Eluid Trevino-Casares v. U.S. Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- In Re: Commissioner's Subpoenas. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Georges v. United NationsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.