Legal Opinion

Priest v. Martin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1837PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Error

1Opinion of the Court

ASSUMPSIT against an administrator on a promissory note executed by the intestate. Pleas, non assumpsit by the intestate, and failure of consideration. Cause submitted, by consent, to the Court without a jury, and judgment for the plaintiff. Held, that the judgment thus rendered takes the place of a verdict, and can be set aside only on the same pre^ ponderance of evidence, that would invalidate a verdict.

Held, also, that the judgment against the defendant, in such case, should not be de bonis propriis, but to be levied out of the assets of the intestate in the defendant’s hands to be…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hays v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Cooke v. WilliamsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Doe on the demise of Condict v. HerrIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Irons v. HusseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1851

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API