Legal Opinion

Central Fabricators, Inc v. Big Dutchman Division of US Industries, Inc

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1976No. 57229, (Calendar No. 5)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, C. J.

We granted leave to appeal to determine whether an interoffice memorandum between corporate executives, of a purported telephone conversation with a customer, should have been admitted at trial as a "business records” exception to the hearsay rule.

We hold that this exhibit was properly excluded by the trial court. The Court of Appeals is reversed.

Plaintiff Central Fabricators, Inc., sold prefabricated building frames to defendant Big Dutchman. After a number of buildings collapsed, defendant refused to pay on its account for certain of the frames. Plaintiff sued and defendant counterclaimed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. People v. KirtdollMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Central Fabricators, Inc. v. Big Dutchman Division of US Industries, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Solomon v. ShuellMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Moldovan v. Allis Chalmers Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. People v. BettisteaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Mendyk v. Michigan Employment Security CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Muilenberg v. Upjohn Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API