Legal Opinion

Hutchens v. Craig

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1940No. 34312PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

This is a proceeding begun by the appellant, the executrix of the estate of A. R. Hutchens, deceased, against Carl N. Craig, State Auditor, revived in the name of J. M. Causey, who succeeded Craig as State Auditor, alleging that A. R. Hutchens was clerk of the chancery court of Humphreys County at the time of his death; that the State then owed him the sum of $3,131.15, the aggregate of fees due him by the. State under Section 6042, Code of 1930, “in connection with lands sold to the state for taxes” and prayed for a writ of mandamus directing the auditor to issue to her a warrant on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Griffin v. Board of Mississippi Levee CommissionersMississippi Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Carbolineum Wood Preserving & Manufacturing Co. v. MeyerMississippi Supreme Court · 1898
  3. State Ex Rel. Rice v. LargeMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Foote v. MyersMississippi Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. General Acceptance Corp. v. HolbrookMississippi Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API