Legal Opinion

Maupin v. Berkley

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 7, 1882PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL FROM MONTGOMERY CIRCUIT COURT. ■ [Cited, Terry v. Johnson, 109 Ky. 589, 22 Ky. L. 1210, 60 S. W. 300; Measeis v. Martin, 93 Ky. 50, 13 Ky. L. 958, 18 S. W. 1028.]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

This action was instituted on a note for $578 against W. R. and D. R. Maupin, and a verdict and judgment rendered against them. The principal in the note, and John Maupin, who was also a surety, were not before the court or made parties. During the pendency of the action W. R. Maupin died and the suit was revived against his administrator. The order of revivor was made more than six months after the qualification, and although notice was given of the intention to revive within the six .months, no objection was made at the time of revivor, and it is now too late to raise…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Meazels v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892
  2. Terry v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Terry v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  2. Love v. GibbsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  3. Staples v. Bedford Loan & Deposit BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API