Smith v. State

OPINION

ROBERTS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted on five charges of bookmaking and on one charge of engaging in the business of bookmaking. The six alleged offenses were all tried together, and punishment was assessed as follows: for each charge of bookmaking, appellant received ten days’ confinement and a $1,000 fine, and for engaging in the business of bookmaking, a sentence of two years’ confinement was imposed.

Appellant alleges fourteen grounds of error and first challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. (A similar contention is expressed in appellant’s sixth ground of error.)

In Cause No.…