Legal Opinion

State v. Heppenheimer

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 15, 1892PublishedCited by 8 opinions

On certiorari. Argued at November Term, 1892, before Justices Dixon, Reed and Garrison.

1Opinion of the Court

' The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dixon, J.

By a statute approved May 9th, 1889 (Pamph. L., p. 436), the governor was authorized to appoint two disinterested and impartial citizens of the state to be commissioners to ascertain the value of a designated tract of land at Sea Girt,, in Monmouth county, and of all rights, private ways, easements and servitudes held, exercised or used by any person or corporation in, upon or over the said tract of land or any part thereof.

The act further provided that the commissioners should tabean oath faithfully, impartially and justly to perform their…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Beekman v. Saratoga & Schenectady Rail RoadNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  4. In the Matter, Etc., Village of MiddletownNew York Court of Appeals · 1880

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Harrison Redevelopment Agency v. DeRoseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
  2. Township of West Orange v. 769 Associates, L.L.C.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  3. Van Dissel v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
  4. State v. PelliniNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  5. State ex rel. Winans v. Commissioners of HighwaysSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API