Legal Opinion

Standard Electric Manufacturing Co. v. Tuttle

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 11, 1920No. 10,546PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Marion Superior Court (al,746); Linn D. Hay, Judge. Action for the appointment of a receiver by Roy Tuttle and others against the Standard Electric Manufacturing Company. From an order appointing a receiver, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court 1

Statement by

Dausman, J.

This cause has been transferred to this court from the Supreme Court. The appellant is a corporation, and appellee Tuttle is a stockholder therein. *560Tuttle instituted this proceeding for the sole purpose of procuring the appointment of a receiver for the corporation. The grounds on which the appointment of a receiver is asked are that the management of the corporation is incompetent, inefficient, and improvident; that the business is being conducted at a loss; that creditors are threatening to institute actions against the corporation on their claims, and are threatening…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Dausman.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wabash Railroad v. DykemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Daugherty v. PayneIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Hursh v. HurshIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Lewis v. NielsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Vance v. SchayerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Gary v. MAJESTIC STAR CASINO, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Pierson, Rec. v. Republic Casualty Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1928
  3. City of Gary v. MAJESTIC STAR CASINO, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API