Legal Opinion

In the Interest of M. B.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 9, 2004No. A04A0586; A04A0587; A04A0588PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Adams, Judge.

M. B., C. B. and D. B., along with T. C., a fourth minor child, were charged with the offense of criminal damage to property in the second degree. T. C. negotiated a plea and testified against the other children. The remaining cases were consolidated for trial and all three of the children were adjudicated delinquent after a hearing on September 25, 2003. They appeal.

M. B., C. B. and D. B. each assert that the trial court erred in adjudicating them delinquent because the evidence was legally insufficient. They contend that T. C.’s testimony, as an accomplice, was not sufficiently…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In the Interest of J. H. M.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  2. McGinnis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  3. In the Interest of R. H.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  4. In the Interest of P. A. W.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. In the Interest of C. H.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In the Interest of S. K.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  2. In Re SkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  3. In the Interest of R. G.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API