Legal Opinion
Raymond G. Cahill v. The New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 22, 1956No. 23559_1PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Per curiam
When this case was first before us, judgment for the plaintiff was reversed, by a divided court, on a ground which rendered unnecessary decision of an alleged error in the admission of evidence of prior accidents. 1 Our judgment was reversed by the Supreme Court, 350 U.S. 898, 76 S.Ct. 180, and by subsequent order the case was remanded to us for determination of the alleged evidentiary error. 351 U.S. 183, 76 S.Ct. 758. Additional briefs have been filed by the parties.
The prior accidents, nine in number, were listed in defendant’s answer to plaintiff’s 27th interrogatory. Each accident was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- District of Columbia v. ArmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Cahill v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. FelgenhauerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
- Raymond G. Cahill v. The New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Floyd Gene Bridger v. Union Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
- Burns v. Penn Central Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Audrey S. Hartel v. The Long Island Rail Road CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Wanser v. Long Island Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Walter Lindheimer v. United Fruit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.