Legal Opinion

Burton v. Statewide Grievance Committee

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 16, 2003No. AC 23557PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*537 Opinion

2Per curiam

The plaintiff, Nancy Burton, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing her appeal from the reprimand issued to her by the defendant, the statewide grievance committee (committee). The committee had affirmed the decision of its reviewing committee, reprimanding the plaintiff for a violation of rule 3.1 of the Rules of Professional Conduct.1 On appeal to this court, the plaintiff claims that the court (1) improperly concluded that there was clear and convincing evidence that she violated rule 3.1 and (2) improperly denied her motion for reargument. We affirm the judgment…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wendt v. WendtConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  2. Somers v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. Wendt v. WendtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  4. Burton v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  5. Smith v. Trinity United Methodist Church of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Statewide Grievance Committee v. BurtonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  2. Burton v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  3. Statewide Grievance Committee v. BurtonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API