Legal Opinion

Heller Ehrman LLP v. Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

California Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 2018No. S236208PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUÉLLAR, J.

Like "cloud-capp'd towers," "gorgeous palaces," and perhaps someday even "the great globe itself," many arrangements endure for some time but eventually dissolve. 1 So too with certain law partnerships-including firms that are retained, before they dissolve, to handle matters on an hourly basis. The question before us is whether a dissolved law firm retains a property interest in such legal matters that are in progress-but not completed-at the time of dissolution. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit asks us to answer this question, which implicates both common…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. United States v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Moore v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allan Diamond v. Hogan Lovells USCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. Allan B. Diamond, Chapter 7 Trustee of Howrey LLP v. Hogan Lovells US LLPDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Kozub v. Arakelian CA5California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API