Jowers v. Lott

Lumpkin, Justice.

Under the facts of this case, which are briefly stated in the head-note, we think it apparent that the judge committed error. If the registered deeds introduced in evidence and relied upon by the defendants were not void for forgery, no case for an injunction was made out. In the absence of any attack upon them, they should have been treated as valid deeds, duly *334proved, and given the probative value to which they purported to be entitled.

Although, on the day when “ the case was closed,” there was an “understanding” that these deeds would be attacked for forgery, and that…