Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Hernandez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 3, 1997Published

1DissentNardelli, J.

I disagree with the majority that the motion court erred in failing to suppress the revolver recovered from the defendant’s car since "the police conduct amounted to a search and seizure without probable cause” and did not fall within the "plain view” doctrine. Initially, the majority seems to conclude that the police did not have probable cause to even stop the car. However, on appeal, the defendant does not contest the propriety of the car stop which led to the discovery of the weapon and even concedes that defendant and his companion were properly frisked during the stop. Defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. ChapmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. People v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. People v. SidhomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API