Dormitory Auth. of N.Y. v. Samson Constr. Co.
Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors
1Dissent
RIVERA, J. (dissenting):
Defendant Perkins Eastman Architects P.C. is not entitled to summary judgment. Material issues of fact, which should go to the jury, exist as to whether plaintiff City of New York (City) is a third-party beneficiary of defendant's contract with plaintiff Dormitory Authority of the State of New York (DASNY), and with respect to DASNY's tort claim for professional malpractice. The Appellate Division thus correctly determined that summary judgment was unwarranted, and we should answer the certified question in the affirmative.
***717The drastic remedy of summary judgment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sommer v. Federal Signal Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Vega v. Restani Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2012
- Kriz v. SchumNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- City School District v. Hugh Stubbins & Associates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Town of Oyster Bay v. Lizza Industries, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.